Main Page :: About Us :: Place Your Link :: Security & Privacy :: Terms of Service :: Add Article
Search:   
webtweety.com webtweety.com
Add Url
 

Software & Networking

Education & Learning

News & Media

Art & Creative

Online & Indoor Games

People & Society

Relationship & Lifestyle

Music & Entertainment

Jobs & Employment

Self Healing

Garden & Home

Business & Companies

Tour & Travel

Fitness & Health

Online Shopping

Medical Care

Science & Space

Children

Automotive

Politics & Government

Adventure & Sports

Banking & Finance

Property & Estate

Eating & Drinking

 

Main Page › News & Media › Spirituality & Religion
 

The New World Order - Part 2

 
Author: William Bell, Jr.

Luke 21:28

Jeffreys premise ignores simple hermeneutic principles. Three questions we must always ask when reading the bible, (1) Whos speaking, (2) Whos spoken to and (3) About whom or what is spoken. Grant ignores this as he seeks to build a case for futurism and the coming Antichrist who will rule the New World Order.

In Luke 21:28, the audience is so clearly identified that the Lord mentions them by name. According to Marks account of this prophecy, the audience consisted of Peter, James, John and Andrew, (Mark 13:5) all of whom were contemporary disciples of the first century. Applying these pronouns to apostles, verse 28 addresses disciples in the first not the 21st century. So there is no mistake about when the events were to occur. The message closes on this note: Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all things take place. (Luke 21:32).

What must Jeffrey do to fill pages in his book? He must ignore Jesus words of a first century fulfillment and fill the space with newspaper headlines. The net results, it sounds sensational and current, though it misses the mark.

Revelation 1:3

Here again is a prophetic chronological marker that breathes imminence of first century fulfillment. To futurize Revelation, one must ignore audience relevance (those to whom the message was first written) and project future generations into prophecy. John wrote of things which must shortly take place.

John pronounced a blessing on the obedient readers who would be blessed by the contents of the book because the time is [was] near. It was near to the original audience hence the use of the present tense, is. Why is it difficult to see that the nearer something is chronologically to one generation, the farther it will be event wise, from the next? The flood was near to Noah, but it is far removed from us.

Jeffrey overlooks this and imagines the event both near and future to us! He offers as proof, the coming New World Order! Try this with Noahs flood. It too was an end-time prophecy, i.e. one of the antediluvian world. How much newspaper exegesis and coming New World Orders will it take to convince the world that the flood is in our future? That amounts to the task before Jeffrey with the end-time of the last days of first century Israel. Its impossible.

When we ignore the words of the scripture, the words of Christ apply, O fools, and slow of hear to believe all that the prophets have spoken (Luke 24:25)

Author Bio:
William Bell, Jr. is an authority in this industry. William has written several articles in the past on this subject.
You can search for this article using: religious news, religious issues, religious social issues, religious product news
 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Scalp Psoriasis
 
The Patriotic History of the Stars and Stripes
 
Rebuilding Society and The Tax Protest Movement: Part Three
 
Compromising American Security
 
Contemporary Art in Guadeloupe
 
Short Sighted
 
If You Don't Understand This, Please Don't Vote
 
Religion ? A Way of "Life"?
 
Americans Need To Know: Devastation Is At Hand!
 
The Potential of a War in Iran
 
 
 
Main Page :: Security & Privacy :: Terms of Service
Copyright © 2006-2008 www.webtweety.com - All Rights Reserved.